![]() ![]() 2 For the reasons discussed in this opinion, the court concludes that Huntsman's investment banker cannot properly be regarded as a litigation or trial consultant within the meaning of Rule 26(b)(4)(B), and further concludes that the documents presented to the court for review do not fall within the ambit of attorney work product. The parties' briefs and oral arguments focused on the availability of Court of Chancery Rule 26(b)(4)(B) 1 or the work product doctrine to shield these documents from production. The plaintiff, Hexion Specialty Chemicals, Inc., has filed two motions to compel discovery primarily covering documents prepared by or relating to the activities of defendant Huntsman Corp.'s financial advisor. ![]() ![]() Holms, Esquire, Vinson & Elkins, L.L.P., Houston, Texas, Attorneys for Defendant/Counterclaim Plaintiff. Thomas, Esquire, Young Conaway Stargatt & Taylor, LLP, Wilmington, Delaware Harry M. Bissell, Esquire, Danielle Gibbs, Esquire, Christian Douglas Wright, Esquire, Kristen Salvatore DePalma, Esquire, Tammy L. Meli, Esquire, Wachtell, Lipton, Rosen & Katz, New York, New York, Attorneys for Plaintiffs/ Counterclaim Defendants. Hein, Esquire, Marc Wolinsky, Esquire, Jeffrey C. Ashman, Jr., Esquire, Potter Anderson & Corroon LLP, Wilmington, Delaware Peter C. HUNTSMAN CORP., Defendant/Counterclaim Plaintiff. and Apollo Global Management, LLC, Plaintiffs/Counterclaim Defendants, v. Apollo Overseas Partners (Germany) VI, L.P. Apollo Overseas Partners (Delaware 892) VI, L.P. Apollo Overseas Partners (Delaware) VI, L.P. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |